Insurance and Engineering
The world is no longer enough, if the two words, engineers and insurance, they are used together, side by side in an interview. Individually they are words to justify their jobs, with his own statements and those own meanings, compile dictionaries, see fit! They serve their own purposes, until such time, if they are used in the same sentence or even on the same page. Engineers and insurance “can not be used, moreover, yes there was a time, this question had no basis, but here and today we can see that the words are not in all sense, a synonym for the other.
The dictionary tells us that, insurance is one thing, protection against a possible event “or” money paid to insure against something or an insurance company for damage, injury, etc. . Well, we said something, but it is a bit confusing.
The dictionary tells us that an engineer is “a person’s ability engineering” and said that an engineer is “a person, the controls of an engine or machine.” And as we have. It is unfortunate that we are not now after the “Engineer insurance or insurance Engineering” to gain valuable insights into what is involved and a little light in this case.
And unfortunately, what has accidentally triggered this subject was what is an Engineering Superintendent once said to a sales engineer, while supped beer in a bar at night. The engineer was, of course, complain about the lack of spare parts that be made available to ships, it was about. Note: This is a frequent maugréer engineers and probably has value and importance in the world, not liking to the company with spare parts expensive, if they can help. Nevertheless, the Superintendent, true to form agreed with the ships, engineer and responsible for everything on paper patrons grow up, households and vessels being of the economy, so that followed all the usual channels Superintendents that the rule in this context. The Superintendent unfortunately too many sips his beer and forget that he has long closure by ships’ clerical staff, make a slip excerpt of the conversation, whether that party or its big ears accidental was heard from.
The declaration was roughly this: “It is not our policy to buy spare parts for our boats, we would not wait until the device failed, and then say, again on ‘insurance. ”
The word is dismayed, in the sense of. Shock, disbelief and outrage could follow in second place. The engineer and the Superintendent has, of course, other topics for discussion as colleagues and engineers and their errors, before finally retiring to their beds and forget everything that had been discussed. With the exception of the engineer, for some reason or the other may never release all the Superintendents “slip” of his mind. And you can debt?
The combat engineers to perform their duties within parameters, and often in harsh and unforgiving environments, but given the edge to always return their tasks and a high level of performance and the end of safety standards. The dictionary, it is quite clear that engineers are looking for qualified machinery. The machine must be both a level of spare parts and engineers for a safe working environment and maintain the machines and installations in satisfactory condition are. A machine that await a future of insurance is not a safe working environment and the machine engineering, it has failed its obligation to maintain the “Machine” or “engine operation. D assurance ‘visibility and an engineer necessary spare parts are the “things”, as protection against a possible event.
On the basis of modern communication and the fact that spare parts are available in most ports in the world, it is not customary for the introduction of large stocks of spare parts for ships. It is largely left to engineers and office workers in the same way that when the engineer command of spare parts, it does so because he needs it. He ordered spare parts for the company, while maintaining the knowledge, what should happen in the next port of call or. no later than one month or so. The engineer further orders, because he plans to use for them. By placing such a market, it is without his full awareness to, the insurance on the machine, which he designated for spare parts. It offers protection against probable cases, which in this case, insurance for the machine or an engine of functional and safe working conditions? as required by the tasks of an engineer.
As a reminder, in a simplified form: The engineer provided by a machine or replacement are used as parties, it plans to maintain the device in a satisfactory working condition and security.
Society in this regard have failed in their duty of the engineer, by not taking the supply of spare parts to the engineer as necessary to accomplish its mission.
On insurance, taxes or money paid to an insurer is a costly when considering the size and volume of what it is. To wait for non-compliance, and thus save money and have spare parts, costs due to a failure, following the repair of equipment and machinery, for which the company ’s insurance, it seems “big” to the owner, the manager. For it is their money returned to it by those who, most of its budget and offers the insurance company pays for all damages resulting from the failure, blocking and subsequent exchange of equipment not.
An engineer working on a boat, where spare parts are not shipped on request from an engineer unnecessary. As custodian preferably with skills or the interest of ensuring its heritage simply due to a lack of evidence to that effect. An engineer is (was) the equipment insurance against failure as it is to provide the spare parts? without it denies that each type of insurance is associated with the title of engineer. He is qualified to obtain and maintain engines and equipment, but is only insured (the “thing”), if it saves the captain. Do you agree that the Back-up and we are left far from a qualified Engineer not yet assured. He can not exercise its duties satisfactorily, it can not provide assurance that its machines and is obviously in its custody, it can not fulfill his duties, in any form or nature, and therefore, is a responsibility for all parties concerned.
An engineer has therefore no error on its own liability insurance for all parties concerned, and that is why we can not use, engineers and insurance “in the same sentence? It is painful and bad.